Stage 1 of 5: ASK

AKUUU
AKUUU WORKSHEETS

Mission: The Proof Detective — Level 8

Level 8 – The Detective General 11 min
A
ASK Activate curiosity

Akuuu’s math teacher writes this on the board:

“Every even number greater than 2 can be written as the sum of two prime numbers.”

She gives examples: 4 = 2+2, 6 = 3+3, 8 = 3+5, 10 = 3+7 = 5+5

Then she says: “This has been checked for millions of numbers, but nobody has ever proven it always works.”

👉 How can something be true for millions of cases but still not proven? Is checking enough?

🐥

Think: If you check 1,000,000 cases and they all work, can you be 100% sure? What if case 1,000,001 breaks the rule?

✏️ Write your opinion: Is checking many examples the same as proving? Why or why not?

K
KNOW Know the concept
  • 🔍 A conjecture is a guess based on patterns — it might be true, but isn’t proven
  • ✅ A proof shows something is true for all cases, not just many
  • ⚠️ Counter-example: One case that breaks a rule destroys the entire claim
1 Quick Check: Test this claim

Claim: “All numbers of the form n² − n + 41 are prime.”

Test: n=1 → 41 (prime) ✓

Test: n=2 → 43 (prime) ✓

👉 Test n=40 and n=41. Does the claim hold?

n=40 result:
n=41 result:
Claim is:
U
UNDERSTAND Understand the idea

Akuuu’s friend claims: “The product of any three consecutive numbers is always divisible by 6.”

He tests: 1×2×3=6 ✓, 2×3×4=24 ✓, 3×4×5=60 ✓, 4×5×6=120 ✓

👉 Is testing 4 examples enough to trust this? What would a real proof need to show?

Testing is / is not enough because:

👉 Hint: Among any three consecutive numbers, what can you say about even numbers? About multiples of 3?

U
USE Use your thinking
2 Task 1: Find the Counter-Example

Claim: “n² + n + 41 is prime for all positive integers n.”

👉 Find the smallest n where this fails. Show your testing strategy.

Smallest counter-example (n):
Result:
My strategy:
3 Task 2: Evaluate the “Proof”

A student “proves” that all odd numbers are prime:

“1 is prime (well, almost). 3 is prime. 5 is prime. 7 is prime. See? All odd numbers are prime!”

👉 What is wrong with this reasoning? Name at least two errors.

💡 Error 1: _______________ Error 2: _______________
4 Task 3: Build a Real Proof

Claim: “The sum of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 3.”

👉 Prove this for ALL cases, not just examples. Use n, n+1, n+2.

Sum = n + (n+1) + (n+2) =
Simplified:
This is divisible by 3 because:
U
UPGRADE Upgrade your skill

🧠 Part A — Transfer

⏸️ COGNITIVE PAUSE — Stop and Predict

Before solving, consider this claim:

“For any whole number n, the number n² − 79n + 1601 is always prime.”

👉 This was tested for n = 0 to 79 and worked every time. Do you trust it? Predict: Is there a counter-example?

I predict:
Reason:

Now investigate:

👉 Find the counter-example. What does this famous example teach us about “tested many times”?

Counter-example (n):
Result:
Lesson:
🐥

Think: This polynomial was specifically designed to generate primes for n=0 to 79. Yet it still fails eventually. What does this say about the difference between “tested” and “proven”?


🧠 Part B — Thinking Pause

  • I questioned claims before accepting them
  • I found counter-examples to destroy false claims
  • I used algebra to prove something for all cases

⭐ Mission Reflection

Today I learned:
The hardest part was:
Next time I will: