Stage 1 of 5: ASK

AKUUU
AKUUU CHALLENGES

Challenge: The Alien Plant Mystery — Level 6

Level 6 – The Analyzer General 9 min
⚡ Challenge

The Alien Plant Mystery

Level 6 — The Analyzer | Ages 9–11 | Science | ⏱️ 10–12 minutes

This is a timed evidence challenge. Three scientists ran experiments on alien plants. One experiment is flawed. Your job: find the mistake, name the error, and explain why the conclusion is wrong.

Time Remaining 12:00

📋 Challenge Rules

  • You have 12 minutes to analyze all 3 experiments
  • Only ONE experiment is valid. The other two have fatal flaws
  • You must identify WHICH is wrong, WHAT error was made, and WHY it breaks the conclusion
  • Partial credit: 1 point for correct identification, 2 points for naming the error, 2 points for explanation

🔬 The Mystery

Scientists discovered alien plants that glow when healthy. They wanted to find out: What makes the alien plant glow brightest?

Each scientist tested a different factor. Here are their methods and results:

👨‍🔬 Scientist A — Dr. Light

Claim: “Plants glow brightest with MORE light.”

Plant Light Water Soil Glow (1-10)
A1 12 hours 100 ml Standard 3
A2 16 hours 100 ml Standard 7
A3 20 hours 100 ml Standard 9
👩‍🔬 Scientist B — Dr. Water

Claim: “Plants glow brightest with MORE water.”

Plant Light Water Soil Glow (1-10)
B1 12 hours 50 ml Standard 2
B2 16 hours 100 ml Standard 7
B3 20 hours 150 ml Standard 9
🧑‍🔬 Scientist C — Dr. Soil

Claim: “Plants glow brightest with SPECIAL soil.”

Plant Light Water Soil Glow (1-10)
C1 16 hours 100 ml Standard 7
C2 16 hours 100 ml Special 8
C3 16 hours 100 ml Extra Special 9
🐥

Think: A fair test changes ONLY one thing at a time. If you change two things, you cannot know which one caused the result. Check: Did each scientist change only ONE variable?

🎯 Your Analysis

Which scientist ran a VALID experiment? (Only one)

Dr. Light
Dr. Water
Dr. Soil

My choice and why:

Which scientist made a MISTAKE? Name the error:

Scientist:
Error name:
What they changed:
What they should have kept the same:

Explain why this breaks their conclusion:

🚀 Bonus: Fix the Broken Experiment

Pick ONE flawed experiment. Redesign it so it actually tests what the scientist claimed.

I will fix:
My new design (what stays same, what changes):
Expected result if the claim is true:

⭐ Challenge Reflection

The trick that fooled me at first:
I knew an experiment was fair when:
I will check for this in:

🧠 Thinking Pause

  • I checked that only ONE variable changed in each experiment
  • I spotted the hidden variable that broke the conclusion
  • I could explain WHY the mistake mattered, not just name it